May 08, 2005

Intellectualismo

The following is a list of posts and responses in a forum exchange at FrontPage Magazine.

I was so amused by the post titles alone, that I haven’t even read the content of the exchange.

You can read them in full if you wish at
http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/index.asp?ID=14579.

("No you can’t"
"Yes, you can"
"RE: Yes, you can: you CAN’T!"
"What did you call me?!"
"RE: What did you call me?!"
"RE: RE: What did you call me?!"
"You’re paranoid."
"No, you are."
"You are"
"RE: You are."
"RE: RE: You are.")

OK, here’s the real list:

Darwinism and Creationism - prairieson 6:01:10 PM

Intelligent design isn't a scientific theory.... - BevD 6:54:59 PM

RE: Intelligent design is scientific theory.... - Cato 7:33:35 PM

No it's not a scientific theory...... - BevD 8:55:45 PM

RE: No it's not a scientific theory...... - Cato 9:10:36 PM

I didn't want to embarrass you by - BevD 9:20:06 PM

RE:You only embarass yourself - Cato 9:23:20 PM

RE: Intelligent Design THEORY - Cato 9:33:18 PM

That's so sad....... - BevD 9:50:21 PM

RE: What is an inference? - Cato 10:04:54 PM

There's no such thing as "empirical observation" - BevD 10:17:14 PM

RE: There's no such thing as - Task 11:29:37 PM

RE: I never said it was - prairieson 8:05:20 PM

RE: Actually - SST 6:38:58 PM

Adaptability IS evolution...... - BevD 7:01:37 PM

RE: Adaptability IS evolution...... - SST 7:06:17 PM

Adaptability is not the same as "fit" - BevD 9:01:47 PM

RE: Of course it isn't - SST 9:45:01 PM

No, I'm pointing out that biologically - BevD 10:09:27 PM

RE: No, I'm pointing out that biologically - SST 10:46:49 PM

RE: Doubtful - prairieson 6:55:31 PM

Read "Origin of the Species"...... - BevD 7:04:17 PM

RE: Read - prairieson 7:15:56 PM

RE: Marxism and National Socialism - Cato 7:40:53 PM

They certainly are not. - BevD 9:07:18 PM

RE: Marx & Darwin -A love story - Cato 9:24:30 PM

And it is apparent that you didn't read it........ - BevD 10:11:12 PM

RE: And it is apparent that you didn't read it........ - Cato 11:41:37 PM

p.s. Species don't transform - BevD 6:29:09 PM

RE: p.s. Species don't transform - RightTeacher 6:45:36 PM

So? Species don't transform into - BevD 6:56:45 PM

RE: p.s. Species don't transform - RightTeacher 6:46:46 PM

RE: Darwinism and Creationism - tony 6:51:57 PM

RE: Darwinism and Creationism - Connie 7:49:45 PM

This is wrong. - BevD 9:16:31 PM

RE: This is wrong. - Connie 10:02:21 PM

No, Connie, no evolutionist - BevD 10:14:17 PM

RE: No, Connie, no evolutionist - Connie 10:22:15 PM

RE: RE: Darwinism and Creationism - prairieson 9:27:52 PM

RE: RE: RE: Darwinism and Creationism - Connie 10:16:37 PM


In the interest of brevity (and when is that ever an issue with me??) I took out some innocuous comments through the middle. (What? Innocuous comments?)

I stumbled across this just because in the last week or two I've been following the farcical Kansas Kangaroo Kourt hearings on Intelligent Design.

Maybe I should just get back to watching my Netflix Queue.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home