I was so amused by the post titles alone, that I haven’t even read the content of the exchange.
You can read them in full if you wish at
("No you can’t"
"Yes, you can"
"RE: Yes, you can: you CAN’T!"
"What did you call me?!"
"RE: What did you call me?!"
"RE: RE: What did you call me?!"
"No, you are."
"RE: You are."
"RE: RE: You are.")
OK, here’s the real list:
Darwinism and Creationism - prairieson 6:01:10 PM
Intelligent design isn't a scientific theory.... - BevD 6:54:59 PM
RE: Intelligent design is scientific theory.... - Cato 7:33:35 PM
No it's not a scientific theory...... - BevD 8:55:45 PM
RE: No it's not a scientific theory...... - Cato 9:10:36 PM
I didn't want to embarrass you by - BevD 9:20:06 PM
RE:You only embarass yourself - Cato 9:23:20 PM
RE: Intelligent Design THEORY - Cato 9:33:18 PM
That's so sad....... - BevD 9:50:21 PM
RE: What is an inference? - Cato 10:04:54 PM
There's no such thing as "empirical observation" - BevD 10:17:14 PM
RE: There's no such thing as - Task 11:29:37 PM
RE: I never said it was - prairieson 8:05:20 PM
RE: Actually - SST 6:38:58 PM
Adaptability IS evolution...... - BevD 7:01:37 PM
RE: Adaptability IS evolution...... - SST 7:06:17 PM
Adaptability is not the same as "fit" - BevD 9:01:47 PM
RE: Of course it isn't - SST 9:45:01 PM
No, I'm pointing out that biologically - BevD 10:09:27 PM
RE: No, I'm pointing out that biologically - SST 10:46:49 PM
RE: Doubtful - prairieson 6:55:31 PM
Read "Origin of the Species"...... - BevD 7:04:17 PM
RE: Read - prairieson 7:15:56 PM
RE: Marxism and National Socialism - Cato 7:40:53 PM
They certainly are not. - BevD 9:07:18 PM
RE: Marx & Darwin -A love story - Cato 9:24:30 PM
And it is apparent that you didn't read it........ - BevD 10:11:12 PM
RE: And it is apparent that you didn't read it........ - Cato 11:41:37 PM
p.s. Species don't transform - BevD 6:29:09 PM
RE: p.s. Species don't transform - RightTeacher 6:45:36 PM
So? Species don't transform into - BevD 6:56:45 PM
RE: p.s. Species don't transform - RightTeacher 6:46:46 PM
RE: Darwinism and Creationism - tony 6:51:57 PM
RE: Darwinism and Creationism - Connie 7:49:45 PM
This is wrong. - BevD 9:16:31 PM
RE: This is wrong. - Connie 10:02:21 PM
No, Connie, no evolutionist - BevD 10:14:17 PM
RE: No, Connie, no evolutionist - Connie 10:22:15 PM
RE: RE: Darwinism and Creationism - prairieson 9:27:52 PM
RE: RE: RE: Darwinism and Creationism - Connie 10:16:37 PM
In the interest of brevity (and when is that ever an issue with me??) I took out some innocuous comments through the middle. (What? Innocuous comments?)
I stumbled across this just because in the last week or two I've been following the farcical Kansas Kangaroo Kourt hearings on Intelligent Design.
Maybe I should just get back to watching my Netflix Queue.